![]() |
||
| Home | Home P3B | About P3B | Component 1 | Component 2 | Component 3 | Project Location | Maps | Reports/Documents | Poverty Score Card | Budget Allocations | | Indonesia | |
|
||||||||||
1. Undertake a summary of the main national poverty reduction priorities and work with BAPPENAS on a Poverty Reduction Action Plan for 2007-2010 for key sectors a. based on recent GOI decisions (e.g., RPJM, RKP) and evaluations/assessments (e.g., Fuel offset Programs, urban and rural projects, WB reports, results of CIDA’s GRS II studies/recommendations, etc.) b. plus initial results of macro-economic poverty mainstreaming ( 1 .2 below) 2. Assess the poverty impact of major macro-economic policies, identify revisions for more effective mainstreaming of priority pro-poor macro-economic programs, and indicate the implications for CD for BAPPENAS and for regional Governments. 3. Examine implications of 1.1 and 1.2 on pro-poor roles, plans and priorities for the districts with focus on key sectors (e.g., education, health, agriculture, social infrastructure) and on local economic programs 4. Select 10-12 districts and the key agencies to be involved in substantive pro-poor planning and budgeting 5. Prepare with each district and civil society the main medium-term poverty reduction priorities and plans for a limited number of key economic and social sectors in light of 1.1 and 1.2 and 1.3 and their own recent pro-poor assessments, experiences and priorities. 6. Determine with each district and civil society the major pro-poor local program and budget priorities for 2008- 2010. 7. Incorporate (6.) into revised regional plans and budgets 8. Link (7) above with national pro-poor plans and funding support to the districts (e.g., revised DAK, CCT, DEKON funding, etc.), revised macro-economic policies, and donor projects 9. Distill lessons learned from and implications for future regional pro- poor planning and budgeting for the GOI and other districts |
|
|||||||||
|